Azinphos methyl
PESTICIDE NAME: Azinphos methyl
______________
Trade name(s): Guthion
_____________
Manufacturer(s): Mobay Chemical Corporation
_______________
Agricultural Chemicals Division
P.O. Box 491
Kansas City , Mo. 64120
I. Basic information
_________________
A. Molecular structure: C10H12N3O3PS2
___________________
B. Chemical name: O,O-dimethyl phosphorodithioate S-ester with
_____________
3-(mercaptomethyl)-1,2,3-benzotriazin-4(3H)-one
C. Derivatives: N-methyl benzamide sulfide; N-methyl benzamide
___________
disulfide; N-methyl benzamide
D. Molecular weight: 317.1 g/mole
_______________
E. Solubility in water: 29 mg/l
___________________
F. Common physical appearance: colorless crystals (pure compound)
__________________________
G. Oral LD50(rat): 16 mg/kg
______________
H. Pesticide classification: organophosphate insecticide
________________________
I. Restricted use list (N.Y.): yes
__________________________
EPA priority pesticide list: no
___________________________
J. Crop use: apple, pear, peach, apricot, plum, prune, cherry,
________
raspberry, grape, blackberry, strawberry, blueberry, beans, celery,
broccoli, cabbage, cauliflower, Brussels sprouts, cucurbits, peppers,
potato, eggplant, spinach, tomato
II. Text
____
Azinphos methyl is a fairly immobile, short-lived organophosphate
insecticide used on a variety of fruit, vegetable and ornamental crops
in N.Y. state. It is rapidly converted to its derivatives which are
more persistent than the parent compound, not subject to leaching and
eventually degraded.Degradation follows first-order kinetics.
III. Soils information
_________________
A. Degradation and transformation
______________________________
The disappearance of azinphos methyl from soil is estimated to be
2-4wks(1), less than one year(1,3), and after 30d at 40deg C in sandy
loam with a half-life in sandy loam of 5d(5). Derivatives were not
found in a field soil after 4yrs(3). A lag time before the chemical's
disappearance has been seen inboth sterile and non-sterile soils, thus
the degradation is not strictly biological. Degradation does follow
first-order kinetics(6). Disappearance of azinphos methyl from soil is
more rapid in the 0-2.5cm layer than at 2.4-7.5cm due to exposure to
elements, photodecomposition, hydrolysis, and volatilization(4). The
photodecomposition is especially evident with high soilmoisture and in
the presence of UV light. Volatility of azinphos methyl is considered
to be low. In the lab a 95% disappearance has been reported after 6d
for analytical grade azinphos methyl and after 22d for diluted
emulsifiable concentrate. In the field, a 50% loss was reported after
12d for emulsion on the soil surface and at 28d for granular form
roto-tilled into the top 4-5 in(3).
The tables below present data concerning azinphos methyl
degradation. The reference is given in parentheses at the end of each
title.
The half-life of azinphos methyl in sterile and non-sterile soils and
at varying temperatures(6)
half-life (days)
_______________________________________
sterile non-sterile
_______________________________________
deg C dry wet dry wet
__________________________________________________
6 484 88 484 64
25 135 29 88 13
40 36 6 32 5
***********************************************************************
Effect of temperature and moisture content on degradation rate of
azinphos methyl in soil. k1 is rate constant or proportionality
constant for reaction(6)
wet soil, soil temp. = 6deg C k1 = 8.5 x 10 3
40deg C k1 = 1.3 x 10 1
soil temp. = 25deg C, dry soil k1 = 6.1 x 10 3
wet soil k1 = 2.8 x 10 2
***********************************************************************
B. Adsorption and transport
________________________
The information in the scientific literature is not extensive
concerning movement of azinphos methyl in soil. The chemical is
considered to be fairly immobile (1,4,5) and its adsorption is
influenced by soil type(1). Azinphos methyl has been reported to be
retained in the upper 30cm layer(4,5), and the upper 2in(2) of the soil
column.
IV. References (*denotes key reference)
__________
1.Kahn, S.U. Pesticides in the Soil Environment. 1980. Amsterdam:
__________________________________
Elsevier.
2.Kuhr, R.J., A.C. Davis and J.B. Bourke. 1974. Bull. Env. Contam.
_________________
Toxiocol. 11. 224-30.
________
*3.Schulz, K.R., E.P. Lichtenstein, T.T. Liang, and T.W. Fuhremann.
1970. J.Econ.Ento. 63. 432-8.
____________
4.Staiff, D.C., S.W. Comer, J.F. Armstrong, and H.R. Wolfe. 1975.
Bull.Environ.Contam.Toxicol. 13. 362-8.
___________________________
*5.Yaron, B., H. Bielorai and L. Kliger. 1974. JEQ. 3. 413-17.
___
*6.Yaron, B., B. Hever and Y. Birk. 1974. J.Agr.FoodChem. 22. 439-41.
______________
Disclaimer: Please read
the pesticide label prior to use. The information contained at this web
site is not a substitute for a pesticide label. Trade names used herein
are for convenience only; no endorsement of products is intended, nor is
criticism of unnamed products implied. Most of this information is historical
in nature and may no longer be applicable.
To Top
For more information relative to pesticides and their use in New York State, please contact the PMEP staff at:
| |
5123 Comstock Hall
Cornell University
Ithaca, NY 14853-0901
(607) 255-1866
|
|
 |
This site is supported, in part, by funding from the
 |
Questions regarding the development of this web site should be directed to the
PMEP Webmaster