PMEP Home Page --> Pesticide Fact Sheets and Tutorials --> Physical-Chemical Parameters --> Physical/Chemical Parameters:Permethrin

Permethrin

      PESTICIDE NAME: Permethrin
      ______________
      Trade name(s): Ambush, Pounce
      _____________
      Manufacturer(s): FMC Corp.
      _______________
                       Ag.Chem Group
                       200 Market St.
                       Philadelphia, PA. 19103
                       ICI Americas, Inc.
                       Ag. Chem. Div.
                       Wilmington, DE.  19897
      I.  Basic information
          _________________
          A. Molecular structure: C21H20Cl203
             ___________________
          B. Chemical name: [(3-phenoxyphenyl methyl)-cis,trans-_3-2,2-
      dichloroethenyl-2,2-dimethylcyclopropanecarboxylate]
          C. Derivatives: dichlorovinyl acid and 3 phenoxybenzyl alcohol
             ___________
      moieties (from hydrolysis); cis-permethrin and trans-permethrin
          D. Molecular weight: 391.3 g/mole
             _________________
          E. Solubility in water: <1 mg/l
             ___________________
          F. Common physical appearance: colorless crystals to viscous
             __________________________
      liquid; water white to pale yellow
          G. Oral LD50(rat): >4000 mg/kg
             ______________
          H. Pesticide classification: synthetic pyrethroid insecticide
             ________________________
          I. Restricted use list (N.Y.): yes
             __________________________
             EPA priority pesticide list: no
             ___________________________
          J. Crop use: apple, pear, peach, cabbage, cauliflower, broccoli,
             ________
      Brussels sprouts, lettuce, endive, escarole, potato, sweet corn
      II.  Text
           ____
           Permethrin is a readily degraded synthetic pyrethroid insecticide
      which is stable in air and light.  It has a half-life of approximately
      28d in mineral soil and persists longer in organic soils. The
      cis-isomer of permethrin has been found to be more resistant to
      degradation than the trans-isomer.  Permethrin is not subject to
      downward movement in soil and has been extensively treated in the
      scientific literature.  Its use in New York is widespread on both fruit
      and vegetable crops.
      III. Soils information
           _________________
           A. Degradation and transformation
              ______________________________
           Permethrin is readily degraded in most soils except organic; its
      half-life ranges from 3 to 6wks(5,7,10).  In organic soils, permethrin
      was found to persist for 28d then decrease slowly during the
      season(6).  At harvest, permethrin concentration has been found to be
      65% of applied in organic soils(8).  There is slower degradation of
      permethrin in sterile than in non-sterile soils.  In sterile mineral
      soil, 8wks after initial application, the permethrin equaled 100% of
      the applied; in non-sterile mineral soil, residues totaled 6% of
      applied; in sterile organic soil the remainder was 100% and in
      non-sterile organic soil 16% of the applied permethrin remained(3).  In
      silty clay loam, the permethrin concentration increased in one study
      during theapplication period due to wash from the plant leaves (July
      1976), but the pesticide  disappeared between Jan. and March of
      1977(1).
           Several factors influence loss rate of permethrin from soil.
      Degradation is slowed or stopped completely with addition of Na-azide,
      steam sterilization or under anoxic conditions(7).  In a well-oxidized
      soil, permethrin is gone in 19d at all pH levels; however, under
      reducing conditions, 33% of applied permethrin disappeared in 26d at
      pH5 but 66% was gone in the same amount of time at pH8.  From this it
      was concluded that permethrin could persist in sediments(4).  Added
      nutrients may increase the degradation of permethrin(7); however,
      application of permethrin has been shown to have decreased the
      availability of N and P in soils(8).
           The tables below present data concerning permethrin degradation in
      soils.  The reference is given in parentheses at the end of each title.
      Concentration of permethrin isomers in silt loam and clay loam soils
      under sterile and non-sterile conditions(10)
            weeks           cis-permethrin        trans-permethrin
                      ________________________________________________
                      (sterile)      (non-ster)  (sterile)  (non-ster)
                      ________________________________________________
      silt   0          0.38 ppm       0.37ppm    0.56ppm    0.60ppm
      loam   2          0.30           0.18       0.54       0.19
             4          0.22           0.09       0.44       0.10
             6          0.28           0.09       0.50       0.07
      clay   0          0.42           0.42       0.65       0.64
      loam   2          0.32           0.37       0.62       0.47
             4          0.30           0.17       0.49       0.14
             6          0.36           0.12       0.64       0.11
      ***********************************************************************
      Persistence of permethrin (% initial application) in soil under surface
      and incorporated application methods(2)
      INCORP.   Time    Sand   Muck    SURFACE    Sand   Muck
      _______   ____    ____   ____    _______    ____   ____
                0.5      43     88                 58     88
                1        14     39                 15     66
                2       <14      7                 <8     29
                3        16                               44
                4        11                               34
                5         5                               34
                6         1           .  Can.Entomol.
                                                            ___________
         113(8). 685-94.
       6.Kahn, S.U. 1980.  Pesticides in the Soil Environment.
                           __________________________________
         Amsterdam:Elsevier.
      *7.Lord, K.A., M. McKinley and N. Walker. 1982.  Environ. Poll. Ser.A.
                                                       _____________
         29. 81-90.
       8.Mathur, S.P., A. Belanger, H.A. Hamilton and S.U. Kahn. 1980.
         Pedobiologia. 20(4). 237-42.
         ____________
      9.Sharom, M.S. and K.R. Solomon. 1981.  J.Agric.FoodChem. 29. 1122-25.
                                              _________________
      *10.Williams, I.H. and M.J. Brown. 1979.  J.Agric.FoodChem. 27(1).
                                                _________________
         130-32.


Disclaimer: Please read the pesticide label prior to use. The information contained at this web site is not a substitute for a pesticide label. Trade names used herein are for convenience only; no endorsement of products is intended, nor is criticism of unnamed products implied. Most of this information is historical in nature and may no longer be applicable.
top To Top
For more information relative to pesticides and their use in New York State, please contact the PMEP staff at:

  5123 Comstock Hall
Cornell University
Ithaca, NY 14853-0901
(607) 255-1866

PLEASE NOTE: If you are not in New York State, you must contact the appropriate agency for your area.
Cornell

This site is supported, in part, by funding from the

ipm logo
Questions regarding the development of this web site should be directed to the PMEP Webmaster