PMEP Home Page --> Pesticide Fact Sheets and Tutorials --> Physical-Chemical Parameters --> Physical/Chemical Parameters:Phorate

Phorate

      PESTICIDE NAME: Phorate
      ______________
      Trade name(s): Thimet, Agrimet, Geomet
      _____________
      Manufacturer(s): American Cyanamide Co.
      _______________
                       Ag. Res. Div.
                       P.O. Box 400
                       Princeton, N.J.  08540
      I.  Basic information
          _________________
          A. Molecular structure: C7H17O2PS3
             ___________________
          B. Chemical name: O,O-Diethyl S-[(ethylthio)methyl]phosphodithioate
             _____________
          C. Derivatives: partially oxidized to sulfoxide then to sulfone
             ___________
          D. Molecular weight: 260.4 g/mole
             ________________
          E. Solubility in water: 17.9 mg/l
             ___________________
          F. Common physical appearance: clear, mobile liquid
             __________________________
          G. Oral LD50(rat): 1-5 mg/kg
             ______________
          H. Pesticide classification: organophosphate insecticide
             ________________________
          I. Restricted use list (N.Y.): yes
             __________________________
             EPA priority pesticide list: no
          J. Crop use: corn, beans, potato
              ________
      II. Text
          ____
           Phorate is an organophosphate insecticide used on vegetable crops
      in New York.  It is oxidized to the sulfoxide then to the sulfone in
      soils.  The degradation presumably follows first-order kinetics.  The
      persistence of phorate is influenced by soil type; the half-life has
      been found to range from lwk to 17d.
           Phorate is considered to be immobile and the adsoption isotherm is
      Freundlich.  Adsorption is reversible; however, hysteresis has been
      found.
      III. Soils information
           _________________
           A. Degradation and transformation
              ______________________________
           A discussion of degradation of phorate in soils must include the
      transformation of the parent material to the metabolites. The sulfoxide
      is formed quite rapidly which is then rapidly transformed to the
      sulfone(8,9).  Sulfoxide is the major metabolite in submerged soils
      while sulfone is predominant in non-flooded soils(8).  Degradation
      follows first-order kinetic reactions and the half-life of phorate
      varies from a few days to a week in sandy loam(12,13), 6d in silt loam
      under surface application and 30d in silt loam under incorporated
      application(11).  The parent phorate decreases to <1-10% in 3-7wks in
      sandy loam soil(12,13) or 14wks in peaty loam(12).  In subtropical silt
      loam, 4% of the applied phorate was recovered at 6wks and 0.4% at
      12wks(14).  The sulfoxide of phorate has been reported to reach its
      maximum concentration at 1wk in sandy loam and 3wks in peaty loam; both
      soils show a 99% disappearance of sulfoxide at 4mo(12).  In this same
      experiment, the sulfone maximum was reached at 4wks in sandy loam, 7wks
      in peaty loam and remained constant (20-30% sandy loam, 30-40% peaty
      loam) at 34wks.
           Degradation appears to be slower in sterile than non-sterile
      soils.  The major reaction in sterile soils is the oxidation of phorate
      to the sulfoxide with the sulfone not appearing until microbes are
      introduced(3).  Persistence of the chemical and the conversion to
      metabolites is greater in muck soils than soils of lesser organic matter
      content(7).  Degradation slows as temperatures at 10cm soil depth
      <6-7deg C(12).
           The following tables present data concerning phorate degradation
      in soils. The reference is given in parentheses at the end of each
      title.
      Recovery of phorate and its metabolites (percent of applied) in loam
      and sand(5)
      Species           Loam                 Sand
      ___________________________________________
      phorate           2.4%                 3.7%
      sulfoxide        24.0%                12.1%
      sulfone          25.1%                 3.5%
      other             1.2%                 1.7%
      ***********************************************************************
      Persistence of phorate (percent of applied) in silt loam as a function
      of surface or mixed application method(11)
               Month          Surface(%)       Mixed(%)
      _________________________________________________
                0             97.6(phorate)    56.0(phorate)
               0.25           44.2(sulfox)     77.1(sulfox)
                1             19.2(sulfone)    49.3(sulfone)
                2              6.1    "        37.6    "
                3              7.2    "        28.9    "
                5              4.5    "        18.7    "
               12              2.1    "        12.1    "
               16              1.4    "         4.3    "
      **********************************************************************
      Percent phorate lost under irrigated and non-irrigated conditions (1)
                Days             % Phorate lost
                _______________________________
                 0 irrigated           0
                   non-irrig.          0
                10 irrigated           6
                   non-irrig.          5
                30 irrigated          69.6
                   non-irrig.         70.0
                45 irrigated           100
                   non-irrigated      98.6
                60 irrigated            -
                   non-irrig.          100
      ***********************************************************************
      Percent of applied phorate as residue in sand and muck(7)
      SAND:    phorate    15% at 1wk, 1% at 4wks
      ____
               sulfoxide  16% at 1wk,                                         %o.m.
      sl    2.32 0.94  264     3.27 0.88  372
      ls    5.48 0.91  298     6.89 0.86  375
      l     9.62 0.92  211    12.65 0.89  277
      sil  16.14 0.88  246    19.23 0.86  294
      l    73.79 1.01  233    96.16 1.02  304
      ***********************************************************************
      IV. References (*denotes key reference)
          __________
       *1.Agnihotri, N.P., H.K. Jain, S.Y. Panday, R.S. Dewan, A.N. Sexena,
           and K.M. Peshwani. 1975.  Ind.J.Ent. 37. 68-71.
                                     _________
        2.Chapman, R.A. and C.M. Cole. 1982.  J.Environ.Sci.Health. B17.
                                              ____________________
           487-504.
       *3.Chapman, R.A., C.M. Tu, C.R. Harris and Carol R. Harris. 1982
           J.Econ.Ento. 75. 112-17.
           ___________
       *4.Felsot, A. and P.A. Dahm. 1979.  J.Ag.FoodChem.1979.27.557-63.
                                           ______________
        5.Fuhremann, T.W. and E.P. Lichtenstein. 1980.  J.Ag.FoodChem. 28.
                                                        _____________
           446-52.
        6.Getzin, L.W. and C.H. Shanks, Jr. 1970.  J.Econ.Ento.63.52-8.
                                                   ____________
       *7.Harris, C.R. and R.A. Chapman. 1980.  Can.Ento. 112. 641-54.
                                                ________
        8.Kahn, S.U. 1980.  Pesticides in the Soil Environment. Amsterdam:
                            __________________________________
           Elsevier Press.
       *9.Leistra, M. 1978.  J.Environ.Sci.Health. B13. 343-60.
                             ____________________
      *10.Lichtenstein, E.P. 1975.  PureAppl.Chem. 42. 113-18.
                                    ______________
      *11.Lichtenstein, E.P., T.W. Fuhremann, K.R. Schulz and T.T. Liang.
           1973.  J.Econ.Ento. 66. 863-6.
                  ___________
      *12.Suett, D.L. 1971.  Pestic.Sci. 2. 105-12.
                             __________
      *13.Suett, D.L. 1975.  Pestic.Sci. 6. 385-93.
                             __________
       14.Talekar, N.S., L.T. Sun, E.M. Lee and J.S. Chen. 1977.
           J.Ag.FoodChem. 25. 348-52.
           _____________
      *15.Visalakshi, A., M.R.G.K. Nair and R.S. Aiyer. 1979.  Pl.andSoil.
                                                               __________
           51.571-6.


Disclaimer: Please read the pesticide label prior to use. The information contained at this web site is not a substitute for a pesticide label. Trade names used herein are for convenience only; no endorsement of products is intended, nor is criticism of unnamed products implied. Most of this information is historical in nature and may no longer be applicable.
top To Top
For more information relative to pesticides and their use in New York State, please contact the PMEP staff at:

  5123 Comstock Hall
Cornell University
Ithaca, NY 14853-0901
(607) 255-1866

PLEASE NOTE: If you are not in New York State, you must contact the appropriate agency for your area.
Cornell

This site is supported, in part, by funding from the

ipm logo
Questions regarding the development of this web site should be directed to the PMEP Webmaster