PMEP Home Page --> Pesticide Active Ingredient Information --> Herbicides, Growth Regulators and Desiccant --> 2,4-D to butylate (Sutan) --> alachlor (Lasso) --> alachlor (Lasso) Proposed Pesticide Tolerance 4/95

alachlor (Lasso) Proposed Pesticide Tolerance 4/95

40 CFR Part 180
[PP 8F3671/P610; FRL-4945-3]
RIN 2070-AC18
Alachlor; Pesticide Tolerance
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 
ACTION: Proposed rule.
SUMMARY: This document proposes to establish an increased tolerance for 
residues of the herbicide alachlor (2-chloro-2',6'-dimethyl-N- 
(methoxymethyl) acetanilide) and its metabolites in or on the raw 
agricultural commodity (RAC) sorghum forage at 2.0 parts per million 
(ppm). The Monsanto Co. requested the establishment of this maximum 
permissible residue of the herbicide.
DATES: Comments, identified by the document control number [PP 8F3671/ 
P610], must be received on or before May 12, 1995. 
ADDRESSES: By mail, submit written comments to: Public Response and 
Program Resources Branch, Field Operations Division (7506C), Office of 
Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 401 M St., SW., 
Washington, DC 20460. In person, bring comments to Rm. 1132, CM #2, 
1921 Jefferson-Davis Hwy., Arlington, VA 22202. Information submitted 
as a comment concerning this document may be claimed confidential by 
marking any part or all of that information as ``Confidential Business 
Information'' (CBI). Information so marked will not be disclosed except 
in accordance with procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2. A copy of the 
comment that does not contain CBI must be submitted for inclusion in 
the public record. Information not marked confidential may be disclosed 
publicly by EPA without prior notice. All written comments will be 
available for public inspection in Rm. 1132 at the address given above, 
from 8 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. 
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: By mail, Robert J. Taylor, Product 
Manager (PM 25), Registration Division (7505C), Office of Pesticide 
Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 401 M St., SW., Washington, 
DC 20460. Office location and telephone number: Rm. 241, CM #2, 1921 
Jefferson Davis Hwy., Arlington, VA 22202, (703)-305-6800; e-mail: [[Page 18559]] SUPPLEMENTARY 
INFORMATION: EPA issued a notice in the Federal Register of October 12, 
1988 (53 FR 39785), that announced that the Monsanto Co., 1101 17th 
St., NW., Washington, DC 20036, proposed amending 40 CFR 180.249 by 
establishing a regulation under section 408 of the Federal Food, Drug, 
and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), 21 U.S.C. 346a, to permit the residues of the 
herbicide alachlor (2-chloro-2',6'-dimethyl-N- (methoxymethyl) 
acetanilide) and its metabolites in or on sorghum forage at 2.0 parts 
per million (ppm) (pesticide petition (PP) 8F3671). This increased 
tolerance was necessary because review of additional data submitted in 
response to reregistration indicated that the current tolerance of 1.0 
for sorghum forage was not adequate and needed to be increased. EPA 
issued a notice in the Federal Register of March 23, 1989 (54 FR 
12010), which announced that the Monsanto Co. proposed amending 40 CFR 
parts 185 and 186 by establishing a regulation under section 409 of the 
FFDCA, 21 U.S.C. 348, permitting residues of the herbicide alachlor in 
or on sorghum milling fractions at 0.5 ppm, sorghum milling fractions 
(except germ) at 0.3 ppm, and sorghum germ at 0.5 ppm (food/feed 
additive (FAP) 9H5576). 
No comments were received in response to these notices of filing. 
During the course of its review, the Agency determined that the 
food/feed additive tolerances for sorghum milling fractions and sorghum 
germ were not needed and that there is no current evidence of use of 
sorghum milling fractions as a human food and very limited evidence of 
use of soghum milling fractions as livestock feed. The petitioner 
subsequently withdrew FAP No. 9H5576. Because it has been longer than 5 
years since the original proposal, the tolerance of 2.0 ppm for sorghum 
forage is being proposed for 30 days following the date of publication 
in the Federal Register to allow for public comment. 
The data submitted in the petition and other relevant material have 
been evaluated. The pesticide is considered useful for the purpose for 
which the tolerance is sought. The toxicological data listed below were 
considered in support of the proposed tolerance. 
1. Several acute toxicology studies place technical alachlor in acute 
toxicity category IV for primary eye and dermal irritation and, acute 
toxicity category III for acute oral, dermal, and inhalation. 
2. A 1-year feeding study with dogs fed dose levels of 0, 1, 3, and 10 
milligrams/kilograms/day (mg/kg/day) with a no-observed effect level 
(NOEL) of 1.0 mg/kg/day based on hemosiderin storage in kidney and 
spleen in males at 10 mg/kg.
3. A 2-year chronic feeding/carcinogenicity study in rats fed 
epichlorohydrin-free alachlor at dose levels of 0, 0.5, 2.5, and 15 mg/ 
kg/day with a NOEL for nonneoplastic toxicity at 2.5 mg/kg/day based on 
ocular lesions and hepatoxicity at 10 mg/kg/day. Carcinogenic effects 
included a nasal turbinate tumor in females at 2.5 mg/kg/day, 
significant increases in nasal turbinate tumors in both males and 
females at 15 mg/kg/day (highest dose tested (HDT)) and a significant 
increase in thymus lymphosarcomas and adrenal pheochromocytomas in 
high-dose females.
4. A second chronic feeding/carcinogenic study with rats fed alachlor, 
with epichlorohydrin, at dose levels of 0, 14, 42, and 126 mg/kg/day 
with a systemic NOEL of less than 14 mg/kg/day based on ocular lesions 
and hepatotoxicity at 14 mg/kg/day. Carcinogenic effects included 
increased number of nasal turbinate tumor in males and females at 42 
mg/kg/day and mg/kg/day, an increase in stomach tumors in both sexes at 
126 mg/kg/day, and an increase in thyroid follicular tumors in males at 
126 mg/kg/day (HDT).
5. A special chronic feeding study in rats fed a dose level of 126 
mg/kg/day. Ocular lesions, mainly, the uveal degeneration syndrome 
(UDS) occurred in 100% of the animals at the end of the study. This 
syndrome was irreversible once it began. Alachlor was a positive 
oncogen with increased nasal turbinate tumors, stomach tumors, and 
thyroid tumors.
6. An 18-month carcinogenicity study in mice fed dose levels of 0, 26, 
78, and 260 mg/kg/day with carcinogenic effects (increased lung 
bronchiolaraveolar tumors in females at 260 mg/kg/day). 
7. A three-generation reproduction study with rats fed dose levels of 
0, 3, 10, 11, and 30 mg/kg/day with a reproductive NOEL of 10 mg/kg/ 
day based on kidney effects in F2 and F3 pups at 30 mg/kg/day (HDT). 
8. A developmental toxicity study in rats fed dose levels of 0, 50, 
150, and 400 mg/kg/day with a developmental toxicity equal to a greater 
than 400 mg/kg/day with a fetotoxic NOEL of 150 mg/kg/day based on an 
increase in post-implantation loss and a slight decrease in mean number 
of viable fetuses at 400 mg/kg/day . The maternal toxicity NOEL for 
this study is 150 mg/kg/day based on soft stools, hair loss, anogenital 
staining, and death at 400 mg/kg/day.
9. A developmental toxicity study in rabbits fed doses of 50, 100, and 
150 mg/kg/day with a developmental NOEL greater than 150 mg/kg/day 
greater than 150 mg/kg/day. The maternal NOEL was 100 mg/kg/day based 
on reduced body weight gain.
10. Mutagenicity studies include several Ames Tests. Alachlor and its 
metabolites were negative in four Ames assays with Salmonella with and 
without S9 activation at 0.1 to 10 mg/plate. Two metabolites of 
alachlor were positive in an Ames test with and without S9 activation 
at 0.01 to 10 mg/plate. Bile from alachlor-treated rates did not induce 
a mutagenic response towards Salmonella strains TA98, TA100, TA1535, 
and TA1537. Other mutagenicity tests include DNA damage/repair in rat 
positive for UDS at the HDT = LD<INF>50 at the 4 doses tested (50, 200, 
and 1,000 mg/kg)--weakly genotoxic; gene mutation in CHO/HGPRT-- 
negative, and in vivo bone marrow chromosome aberration assay-- 
Alachlor has been classified as a B<INF>2 carcinogen--``Probable Human 
Carcinogen'' by the Agency. Alachlor met all but one of the criteria 
specified for the B<INF>2 classification. Alachlor produced an 
increased incidence of nasal turbinate tumors (mostly benign) at the 
mid and high doses, in both sexes, thyroid follicular tumors in male 
rats and malignant stomach tumors in male and female rats in Long-Evans 
rats in three different experiments at more than one dose level via 
dietary administration. Alachlor also produced a statistically 
significant increase in lung tumors in female CD-1 mice at two dose 
levels. In another experiment with Long-Evans rats, nasal turbinate 
tumors occurred only 5 to 6 months after exposure. The tumor incidence 
was as high at 50% and tumor site was unusual, i.e., not an increase of 
normal high background tumor type. A metabolite of alachlor was 
mutagenic in the Ames Test at 6 dose levels, and alachlor is 
structurally similar to acetochlor and metolachlor, two other known 
carcinogens. A detailed discussion of the Agency's classification of 
alachlor as a B<INF>2 carcinogen was published in the Federal Register 
of December 31, 1987 (52 FR 49480). The publication was entitled 
``Alachlor, Notice of Intent to Cancel Registrations, Conclusion of 
Special Review.''
For the purpose of risk characterization of alachlor, the use of the 
linearized multi-stage model, as recommended to EPA's Carcinogenic Risk 
Assessment Guidelines, was applied to the rat oncogenicity data 
discussed above. As a result, the cancer potency value for alachlor, 
known as the ``Q<SUP>*1'', was calculated to be 8 X 10<SUP>-2 or 0.08 
(mg/kg/day)<SUP>-1. Refer to the [[Page 18560]] document published in 
the Federal Register of December 31, 1987 (54 FR 49484) for details. 
The reference dose (RFD) based on a NOEL of 1.0 mg/kg/day (1-year 
feeding study in dogs) and an uncertainty factor of 100 was calculated 
to be 0.01 mg/kg/day. The theoretical maximum residue contribution 
(TMRC) for the overall U. S. population from published and proposed 
uses recommended through reregistration is 0.000532 mg/kg/day or 5.3% 
of the RfD. For the most highly exposed subgroup, nonnursing infants 
less than 1 year old, the published and proposed use recommended 
through reregistration is 0.002184 mg/kg/day or 21.8% of the RfD. The 
current action of increasing the tolerance on sorghum forage to 2.0 
does not contribute any additional TMRC or utilize additional RfD 
because sorghum forage is not a human food and current tolerances in 
livestock commodities will not be exceeded as a result of the proposed 
increase in the tolerance for sorghum forage. 
Refinements in residue and percent-crop treated information were 
considered in calculating the Anticipated Residue Contribution (ARC) 
for the same population groups above. The ARC is considered the more 
accurate estimate of dietary exposure. These exposure estimates were 
then compared to the RfD for alachlor to get estimates of chronic 
dietary risk. The ARC for the overall U. S. population for published 
tolerances is 1.3 X 10<SUP>-5 or 0.1% of the RfD. For the most highly 
exposed subgroup, nonnursing infants, the ARC is 5.4 X 10<SUP>-5 or 
less than 1% of the RfD. The current action does not contribute 
additional ARC or utilize additional RfD. Other tolerances proposed by 
reregistration result in an ARC of 4.0 X 10<SUP>-6 mg/kg/day or 0.04% 
of the RfD for the overall U.S. population and an ARC of 5.3 X 10<SUP>- 
5 mg/kg/day or 0.5% of the RfD for nonnursing infants, less than 1 year 
Based on a Q<SUP>*1 of 0.08 (mg/kg/day)<SUP>-1 the upper-bound cancer 
risk was calculated to be 1.4 X 10<SUP>-6 and contributed through all 
published and proposed uses for alachlor. The current action for 
sorghum forage contributes no additional risks. 
There are currently no regulations against the registration of this 
chemical for use on sorghum forage. Even though alachlor is classified 
as a probable human carcinogen, EPA believes the establishment of this 
tolerance will not pose an unreasonable risk to humans as a result of 
dietary exposure.
The pesticide is useful for the purposes for which tolerances are 
sought. The nature of the residues is adequately understood for the 
purposes of establishing tolerances. Adequate analytical methods (high- 
pressure liquid chromatography and gas chromatography) are available 
for enforcement purposes (PAM II, Method III). 
Based on the information considered by the Agency, the Agency has 
determined that when used in accordance with good agricultural 
practice, this ingredient is useful and that the tolerance established 
by amending 40 CFR part 180 would protect the public health. It is 
proposed, therefore, that the tolerance be established as set forth 
Any person who has registered or submitted an application for 
registration of a pesticide, under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, 
and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) as amended, which contains any of the 
ingredients listed herein, may request within 30 days after publication 
of this document in the Federal Register that this rulemaking proposal 
be referred to an Advisory Committee in accordance with section 408(e) 
of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act. 
Interested persons are invited to submit written comments on the 
proposed regulation. Comments must bear a notation indicating the 
document control number, [PP 8F3671/P610]. All written comments filed 
in response to this petition will be available in the Public Response 
and Program Resources Branch, at the address given above from 8 a.m. to 
4 p.m., Monday through Friday, except legal holidays. 
The Office of Management and Budget has exempted this rule from the 
requirements of section 3 of Executive Order 12866. Pursuant to the 
requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (Pub. L. 96-354, 94 Stat 
1164, 5 U.S.C. 601-612), the Administrator has determined that 
regulations establishing new tolerances or raising tolerance levels or 
establishing exemptions from tolerance requirements do not have a 
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. 
A certification statement to this effect was published in the Federal 
Register of May 4, 1981 (46 FR 24950).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180
Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure, 
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides and pests, Reporting and 
recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: March 30, 1995.
Stephen L. Johnson,
Director, Registration Division, Office of Pesticide Programs. 
Therefore, it is proposed that 40 CFR part 180 be amended as follows:
1. The authority citation for part 180 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 346a and 371.
2. In Sec. 180.249, by amending the table therein by revising the entry 
for sorghum forage, to read as follows: 
Sec. 180.249 Alachlor; tolerances for residues. 
* * * * *
Parts per
Commodity	million
*	*	*	*	*
Sorghum, forage............................................	2.0
*	*	*	*	*
[FR Doc. 95-8729 Filed 4-11-95; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560-50-F